Home       Site Map      Archives      Search      Bio & Photos       FAQs       Links       Contact       Get Brent       Help

 

Want more?  Check the archives!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Kevorkian's Quest:

Treating The Desire TO Die

March, 1999

 

            I have a hard time picturing it, even eight years later.  If there were ever a man less given to self-pity than my brother-in-law I never met him, yet whom of us wouldn’t break at least once at the thought of imminent death?

            Fear wasn’t an issue.  Devoutly Christian, he felt sure of his place.  It was more that you’re not supposed to die at 37, even of cancer.  Not with a wife and three young children, not with so much undone.  That he could remain so relentlessly upbeat testified to both the man and his faith.

            But once, alone in the bathtub, my sister found him weeping at the thought that his youngest might not remember him.  Yet those rare dark moments seemed only to motivate him to survive.  There was no notion of ending it.

            Last week’s conviction of Jack Kevorkian for the second degree murder of a Las Vegas man has again brought the issue of assisted suicide to the forefront, not that it has been that far removed.  We Californians defeated a state proposition in 1992 that would have allowed the procedure; a Berkeley assemblywoman is now attempting to undo the ballot box with legislation.  Our neighbors in Oregon approved their “Death With Dignity Act” in 1994, though it was not enacted until last year. 

This February the New England Journal of Medicine printed a study on the 15 assisted suicides reported in Oregon during 1998.  While the study did support some of the campaign assertions made by the Act’s proponents, such as no botched, lingering deaths or suicides for financial reasons, it is generally pretty stark.

Supporters had promised that assisted suicide would be a last resort, applied only in cases of unbearable pain.  They said that most would die with the advice and support of their family doctor, professionals who would know them well and hold their interests at heart. 

Yet only one death patient listed concern over pain as their motivation.  Six of the 15 sought lethal prescriptions from two or more doctors.  The first to take advantage of the law had seen the physician who wrote her lethal prescription for less than three weeks; her own doctor refused, as did a second who diagnosed her as depressed.  A suicide advocacy organization finally directed her to an amenable physician.

The report concludes that “the decision to request and use a prescription for lethal medication was associated with concern about loss of autonomy or control of bodily functions, not with fear of intractable pain or concern about financial loss.”  Disability activists worry that suicides assisted for concern over needing help in the bathroom and other activities will affect far more disabled and elderly people than those terminally ill.

            But is their fear reasonable?  According to a Journal of Medical Ethics study of euthanasia in the Netherlands, which has one of the world’s oldest assisted suicide laws, the process is “beyond effective control.”  Patients need not be terminally ill to be assisted in suicide.  The depressed are dispatched regardless of whether they suffer any organic disease, while children with birth defects can be euthanized based on their presumed low quality of life.  In an incredible 20% of Dutch assisted suicides, amounting to almost 1,000 annually, the patient did not request it. 

            Despite the personal cost, my brother-in-law both gave and received priceless gifts of devotion in those last days and was able to meet his first grandchild (from a previous marriage).  Still, I can understand some of the arguments in favor of assisted suicide.  There are the issues of personal autonomy and consent, though proper treatment for pain and depression can eliminate the desire to die.  I can’t help but wonder if our efforts wouldn’t be better spent there.

            I always appreciate letters and emails that take honest issue with me, particularly on nerve-scorchers such as this.  Now is no exception, but I implore dissenters to spare me the “you can’t legislate morality” patter.  You not only can, societies throughout time have proven that you must.  I know of none that haven’t and survived.

 The real question, then, is which values we will sanction.  Given that, put me down for the inestimable gift of life. 

 

 

© 1997 – 2002 Brent Morrison

 

 

 

 
 

 

Email Brent:

 

Brent@brentmorrison.com

 

 

 

Latest columns:

   
 

Getting the most hits:

 
 

Need an antidote to "Harmful to Minors"?

(See column) 

Try Rae Turnbull's excellent "Be the Parent Your Child Deserves"

 
 

Get Brent

in your local paper.

Click here!

 
 

Hear Brent

speak to your community group, church, fundraiser, or business group.  Click here.