Home       Site Map      Archives      Search      Bio & Photos       FAQs       Links       Contact       Get Brent       Help

 

Want more?  Check the archives!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Can a Million Moms be Wrong?

May, 2000

 

“A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.” –

Second Amendment to the Constitution of the United States

 

“We, the mothers, are calling on Congress to enact common sense gun control legislation by Mothers’ Day 2000 ... We call on Congress to require all handgun owners to be licensed and that they be required to register their weapons with the proper authorities.  It makes sense.” –

From the Million Mom March web site

 

            At the risk of having some skip today’s column, I will reveal that it ends with the supposition that organizers of the Million Mom March (“MMM”) have something more in mind than common sense gun policy.  It’s a chance I’ll take because I want to start with my own position, bias if you prefer, and don’t mind being judged in that context.  I’d rather scare people off than deceive them to make converts.

            So here goes: I like the Constitution as it is.  If you don’t, the way to change it is to amend it.  Seems simple enough to me, but some folks aren’t above a little sleight-of-hand.  This is not to say the MMM marchers themselves want to mislead anyone; rather, they should take a hard look at the movement’s leadership and their goals.  It’s OK to be used, but one should know what for.

The group’s founder is Donna Dees-Thomases.  On the MMM web site, Ms. Dees-Thomases says the idea was born as she watched news coverage of the horrific shootings at the North Valley Jewish Community Center in Los Angeles last summer.  “I felt ashamed.  Ashamed because I've sat back while others battle the gun lobby to protect our children.”

The facts of the incident are a little different.  Buford O. Furrow Jr., the man charged with wounding five and killing a Filipino-American mail carrier, is a convicted felon for whom it is illegal to possess any firearm.  His stash of weapons were largely illegal or illegally acquired in any event. 

How much effect would the MMM’s key proposed solutions – licensing of handgun owners, registration of handguns, safety locks, limiting handgun purchases to one a month – have had on a man like Burrow?  Common sense says “squat,” though perhaps MMM’s final proposal would: “No-nonsense enforcement of gun laws.”  And who has been the primary advocate of that?  The so-called gun lobby, led largely by the dreaded National Rifle Association and other gun-owner organizations.

Dees-Thomases is adamant that MMM doesn’t oppose private gun ownership and originally said the march was intended to promote gun safety.  Yet offers of assistance from the Women's Shooting Sports Foundation were dismissed out of hand.  “We assumed when they initially said the march was about firearms safety, they truly meant it, so we offered to help” said WSSF Executive Director Shari LeGate.  “They rejected our offer, sending the message that clearly this is politically motivated and has nothing to do with gun safety.”  The MMM subsequently revised its stated goals.

Is it all politically motivated?  The MMM made a show of non-partisanship, proclaiming that no politicians would be allowed on the podium.  They weren’t, but messages from both the President and Mrs. Clinton were broadcast on jumbo screen televisions.  If any other politicos were extended the privilege I missed it.

  Barely reported is the fact that, according to Dees-Thomases, the MMM organization will likely apply for a tax-exempt status that would permit political activities.  This will at least be a political lobbying group and I predict they won’t stick solely to their guns; the “Mom” label, a heart-tugger for most of us, will be slapped on a wide range of issues.  They will eventually call for a ban on private ownership of firearms or come so close that you won’t be able to tell the difference.  The Constitution won’t get a more than a wink and a nod, except as a last resort.

If reducing gun crime is the objective, and it should be, let’s focus on measures that would stop the Buford O. Furrows of this world.  And let’s seek leaders who are forthright about their goals, motives, and methods.

 

 

© 1997 – 2002 Brent Morrison

 

 

 

 
 

 

Email Brent:

 

Brent@brentmorrison.com

 

 

 

Latest columns:

   
 

Getting the most hits:

 
 

Need an antidote to "Harmful to Minors"?

(See column) 

Try Rae Turnbull's excellent "Be the Parent Your Child Deserves"

 
 

Get Brent

in your local paper.

Click here!

 
 

Hear Brent

speak to your community group, church, fundraiser, or business group.  Click here.